USPTO serial 79039514
CURLFORMERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3679861Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CURLFORMERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rose Auslander
Rose Auslander Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP2 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS; SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, HAIR SETTING LOTIONS; HAIR STYLING LOTIONS; HAIR PERMING LOTIONS, NAMELY, PERMANENT WAVE PREPARATIONS; HAIRSPRAYS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | [ HAND IMPLEMENTS FOR USE BY HAIRDRESSERS AND PARTS AND FITTING THEREFOR, NAMELY, HAIR CUTTING SCISSORS, ELECTRIC AND BATTERY POWERED HAIR CLIPPERS, HAIR TRIMMERS, NON-ELECTRIC HAIR TRIMMERS; ] NON-ELECTRIC CURLING IRONS; AND STRUCTURAL PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL OF THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | [ HAIR COLORING FOILS FOR HAIR DYING OR HAIR TINTING MADE OF PLASTIC, CELLULOSE, COATED PAPER, ALUMINUM FOIL OR METALLIZED POLYESTER ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hair Flair Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Hair Flair Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Hair Flair Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named CURLFORMERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |