USPTO serial 79039564
MONTE-CARLO RESORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MONTE-CARLO RESORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
MONACO, MC
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET; DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
MC
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET; DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET; DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
MC
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET; DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Shapiro
Deborah Shapiro Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueThe Chrysler BuildingNew York, NY 10174Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET; DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME DES BAINS DE MER ET; DU CERCLE DES ETRANGERS
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MONTE-CARLO RESORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |