Drawing for FLAVOURVISION

USPTO serial 79039572

FLAVOURVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580605Status 708Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with FLAVOURVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[ Food additives, namely, natural or synthetic aromatic preparations, other than essential oils, for foodstuffs and for beverages ] [ ; spices comprising natural or synthetic aromatic or flavoring substances; condiments, namely, sauces ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Marketing consultancy in relation to the design, development and marketing of aromas; marketing of aromas for others; market studiesACTIVE—
042Research, design and development services in relation to aromasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 9, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 10, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 10, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 10, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 25, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 24, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 23, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 16, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 16, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 29, 2008PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance