Drawing for HEHE

USPTO serial 79039574

HEHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612535Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Common sheet glass for building; non-metallic transportable buildings; window glass for building; non-metallic glass tiles; building stone; monuments of stone; asphalt roof coatings; semi-worked woods; refractory construction materials, not of metal; Concrete building materials, namely, blocksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 1, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 10, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance