USPTO serial 79039592
APEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LEBOW
G. MATHEW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP230 PARK AVENUE10th FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchen utensils and containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, basins and kitchen hand tools, namely, pails, dust bins; household utensils and containers, not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, spatulas, racks and stands for drying or airing clothes, bottle stands and stands for dishes; combs and sponges, namely, household sponges, cleaning sponges, synthetic household sponges; brushes, except paintbrushes, namely, floor brushes, brushes for toilet cleaning purposes, brushes for general cleaning purposes, namely, clothes brushes, double velvet brush for clothes and fabrics carpet, dusting brushes, washing brushes, shoe brushes, cleaning pads, adhesive brushes, anti-scratch brushes to wash cars, scrubbing brushes with telescopic handles; brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning cloths, floor-washing sponges with handles, squeegees, window and furniture dusters, feather dusters, washable window and furniture dusters, brooms, flexible brooms, broomsticks, mops, carpet sweepers, hand-operated non-electric carpet sweepers, dust pans, acrylic-fiber mops for cleaning windows, extensible handles for squeegees and dusters; steel wool for cleaning; unworked or semi-worked glass, except glass used in building; beverage glassware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2009 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |