Drawing for HOPF WEISSE

USPTO serial 79039597

HOPF WEISSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488872Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOPF WEISSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia J. Lee

Cynthia J. Lee Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP400 Interstate North ParkwaySuite 1500Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers, beers low in alcohol [, non-alcoholic beers; mineral waters and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soda pops, malt beverages, malt coolers, carbonated beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043[ Providing of food and drink; providing temporary accommodation ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 19, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 8, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 26, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 26, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 7, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance