Drawing for FIBERXPLORER

USPTO serial 79039642

FIBERXPLORER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3527691Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 4, 2008
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBERXPLORER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 800Washington, DC 20037-3202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical time domain reflecting (OTDR) meters; optical power meters; optical spectrum analyzers; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical fibers, connectors for optical fibers, modules of laser diodes, namely, LD Modules, photo-diode (PD) modules, laser source, optical switch module, optical attenuator module, Optical Couplers, optical-to-electronic and electronic-to-optical interface units; telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, optical fiber communications network; measuring or testing machines and instruments, namely, optical fiber testing device, optical module testing device, optical loss measuring device, optical fiber fault detectorSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 5, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 5, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 5, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 10, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance