Drawing for ETERE

USPTO serial 79039652

ETERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 22, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 21, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 16, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance