USPTO serial 79039652
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |