USPTO serial 79039658
ZWICK/ROELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3550358Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2008
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ZWICK/ROELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN ALUMIT
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatuses and instruments, namely, materials testing machines and simulation test equipment for materials testing of specimens such as raw materials, components, and finished products; electrical and electronic apparatuses and instruments, namely, drive systems comprised of electrical controllers; electrical and electronic apparatuses and instruments, namely, manipulators for the remote operation of robotic arms, automated laboratory equipment mainly for cutting specimens; Testing machines for static materials testing for different lines of products depending on the given requirements with static loads for determination of static strength properties of raw materials, components, and finished products; Testing machines for dynamic materials testing with cyclic and oscillating loads for determination of fatigue strength properties of raw materials, components, and finished products, namely, servo-hydraulic testing machines, high frequency pulsators, rotary bending machines, and electro-mechanical testing actuators; Testing machines and testing instruments for static materials testing with impact loading for determination of strength properties of raw materials, components, and finished products at high strain rates, namely, pendulum impact testers and drop weight testers; machines and instruments for hardness testing of metals, plastics, rubber and special materials; testing instruments, namely, electro-mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, and magnetic resonance drives; Automated testing machines for the performance of tensile tests on metals; automatic testers for non-rigid samples such as foils, textiles or fleece; load cells for converting the physical quantity force to an electrical, measurable current and consisting of mechanical deformation bodies with bonded strain gauges; specimen grips used for testing material specimens; compression test kits comprising compression platens, compression dyes, adapters and connectors; flexure test kits comprising load cell adapters, tensile grips, and compression platens; testing machines for testing adhesive tapes and composites; paper testing machines for testing the burst strength, the strip crush, ring crush, flat crush or edge crush resistance of paper; wood and chipboard testers for testing the peel and layer strength, the extraction tests on screws, and shear tests of wood and chipboards; foodstuffs testers, for testing the viscosity of yoghourt, for determining the ripeness of vegetables, for determining the spreadability of butter, for determining the characteristics of dough; optical, weighing, measuring, signalling and checking apparatuses and instruments for testing, namely, extrusion plastometers for delivering standard values of the melt mass-flow rate (MFR) and melt volume-flow rate (MVR) of thermoplastic materials under specified conditions of temperature and load; abrasion testers for the evaluation of the resistance of elastomers to abrasion; and rebound resilience testers for determination of the rebound resilience on rubber, elastomers and flexible cellular materials; material examining machines and devices for the examination of materials and structures for physical properties, namely, HDT/Vicat testers for the determination of Heat Deflection Temperature, Vicat Softening Temperature, and creep test characteristics; Strain measuring device, namely, extensometers, sensor arm extensometers, incremental and analogue clip-on extensometers, and extensometers for compression and flexure tests; computer software for use in testing and examining material samples; computers; computer accessories for measuring, controlling and adjusting technology, namely, data processing programs; test chambers for load and tension measurements under environmental conditions, namely, for testing different materials under different temperatures; temperature and pressure sensors; computer operating programs for use in checking the various functions of vehicles and parts of vehicles, and for use in scientific analysis of samples in the field of biomedicine and statics | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of machines, namely, examining and materials testing machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; services of engineers, namely, materials test engineering; calibration services; technical project planning, namely, planning for the re-specification, and retrofitting of testing machines and test labs; quality testing of testing machines and testing systems; material testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zwick GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Zwick GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ZwickRoell GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ZWICK/ROELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |