Drawing for NPL NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY APPLIED

USPTO serial 79039682

NPL NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY APPLIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728458Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NPL NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY APPLIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID H. JAFFER

DAVID H. JAFFER PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 10500-IP GROUPMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling apparatus and equipment, namely, instruments for measurement and calibration of time, mass, distance, and light; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; computers; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters in the fields of science and technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Printed matter, namely, periodicals related to scientific and technical topicsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of science and technology; training services in the fields of scientific and technology measurementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research; design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 29, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 29, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 22, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 28, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance