USPTO serial 79039685
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANING, SCOURING AND POLISHING SUBSTANCES; BATH-FOAM, SHAVING FOAM, AFTERSHAVES, SKIN CLEANSING LOTIONS; SOAPS; PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS, COSMETICS, HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | SPECTACLES AND NON-METAL SPECTACLE HINGES WHICH ARE SOLD AS A UNIT, SUN GLASSES, SPECTACLE FRAMES, SPECTACLE CASES AND SAFETY PROTECTIVE GOGGLES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | COSTUME JEWELRY, CUFF-LINKS, TIE-PINS, WATCHES, JEWEL CASES OF PRECIOUS METAL, KEY RINGS OF PRECIOUS METAL, ORNAMENTS OF PRECIOUS METALS, RINGS, NECKLACES, BRACELETS, BROOCHES, EARRINGS, TIE CLIPS, CLOCKS; JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, WALLETS, LUGGAGE, ATTACHE CASES, TOTE BAGS, BRIEFCASES, SPORTS BAGS, TRAVELING TRUNKS, CARRY-ON BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVELING, KEY CASES, BACKPACKS, TOILETRY BAGS SOLD EMPTY, PURSES, ANIMAL SKINS; HIDES; TRUNKS AND TRAVELING BAGS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS; WHIPS, HARNESS AND SADDLERY | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | FOOTWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BELTS, SUSPENDER BELTS FOR MEN, BLAZERS, BLOUSES, BONNETS, BREECHES, CAFTANS, CAPS, CARDIGANS, CASSOCKS, CHEMISETTES, FUR CLOAKS, COATS, COLLARS MADE IN WHOLE OR PART OF FUR, FOULARDS GILETS, NAMELY, HIP-LENGTH JACKET, GLOVES, GOWNS, HATS, HOSIERY, JACKETS, JEANS, JERSEYS, JUMPERS, LOUNGE-WEAR, NAMELY, LOUNGE PANTS, MANTLES, NECKTIES, NIGHT-GOWNS, OVERALLS; KNITWEAR, NAMELY, JACKETS, SOCKS, DRESSES, SLIPS, BRAS, MANTLES, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SCARVES, GLOVES, CAPS, PANTS; OVERCOATS, BLOUSONS, PAJAMAS, PANTY-HOSE, PANTS, PELISSES, PETTICOATS, PULLOVERS, RAINCOATS, ROBES, SCARVES, SHAWLS, SHIRTS, SHORTS, SKIRTS, SLACKS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, STOLES, HEADSCARVES, SUITS, SWEATERS, TAILLEURS, TIES, TIGHTS, TOPS, TRENCH COATS, TROUSERS, BATHING AND SWIM TRUNKS, T-SHIRTS, TUNICS, UNDERWEAR, VESTS, WAISTCOATS, AND WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, BELTS MADE OF LEATHER, JAPANESE STYLE SANDALS OF LEATHER, LEATHER COATS, LEATHER HEADWEAR, LEATHER JACKETS, LEATHER PANTS, LEATHER SHOES, LEATHER SLIPPERS, SUITS OF LEATHER, TROUSERS OF LEATHER | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |