Drawing for CRYO-SAVE

USPTO serial 79039696

CRYO-SAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3547014Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2008
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYO-SAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Holt

William H. Holt Law Offices of William H. Holt14584 West Dartmouth AvenueLakewood, CO 80228UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research in the field of removal, treatment and processing of living human cell material, in particular body's stem cells and body's bone marrowSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Medical services and services of medical specialists, namely, medical services in the field of removal, treatment and processing of human blood and umbilical cord blood, and removal, treatment and processing of living human cell material, in particular stems cells and bone marrow; blood bank services and services of a bank for storing the aforesaid cell material, namely, stem cell banks and bone marrow banksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 24, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance