Drawing for SABZ

USPTO serial 79039717

SABZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SABZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, heatingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture; armchairs; seatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
027Matting and other materials for covering existing floorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Gardening, landscape gardening servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 11, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance