Drawing for COLOR REPUBLIC

USPTO serial 79039733

COLOR REPUBLIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3501965Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 16, 2008
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR REPUBLIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Shampoo; hair care and styling products, namely, hair styling gel, wax for removing body hair and hairspray; hair dyes; cosmetic products, namely, cosmetic creams and beauty gels for body and faceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Education and training services, namely, classes, seminars, workshops in the field of cosmetics, hair care and styling productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Hair salon service, namely, cutting, coloring, dying and modeling of hair; beauty salon services, namely, application of cosmetics and make-upSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 3, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 17, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 17, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance