Drawing for MYRTARGOS

USPTO serial 79039741

MYRTARGOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3512683Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 7, 2008
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYRTARGOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hae Park-Suk

Hae Park-Suk Barnes & Thornburg LLP1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CosmeticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of vision loss, vascular diseases, neurological diseases, memory loss, liver injury, high blood pressure, cardiovascular diseases, heart diseases, lung diseases, skin aging, diabetes, cancer, coronary heart diseases, ulcer, inflammation, hepatitis, atherosclerosis and diseases related to aging; Nutritional food additives of vegetable origin for medical purposes for use in foods for human consumption; Food additives for medical purposes, namely, food supplements of vegetable originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
029Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods; food additives for non-medical purposes, namely, fruit extractsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, beverages containing fruit extractsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 15, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 8, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 8, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 20, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 5, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance