Drawing for SMOVE SIMPLY IMPROVE

USPTO serial 79039750

SMOVE SIMPLY IMPROVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3572729Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 10, 2009
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMOVE SIMPLY IMPROVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith W. Medansky

Keith W. Medansky DLA Piper US LLPP.O. Box 64807Chicago, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for clinical diagnosis, medical aids, apparatus for measuring blood pressure, apparatus for blood analysis, compression bandages and medical compression stockings and tights; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopaedic footwear, orthopaedic belts, orthopaedic soles, orthopaedic braces, orthopaedic support bandages, orthopaedic supports, orthopaedic walkers; suture materials, namely, suturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, and headgear for use in a medical setting, namely, caps, hats, slippers, shoes, stockings, socks, bras, pajamas; sportswear and sports footwear, namely, warm-up suits, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sneakers, socks, stockings, shoes, shirts, shorts, pants, skirts, underwear, bras, coats, jackets, caps, hats, slippers, spencers, headbands, wristbandsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 20, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 11, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 11, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 27, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 10, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 29, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance