USPTO serial 79039792
AFFINITY CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2012
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFFINITY CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
E-15142 ARTEIXO (LA CORUÑA), ES
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
E-15142 ARTEIXO (LA CORUÑA), ES
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
E-15142 ARTEIXO (LA CORUÑA), ES
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN A GUNDERSEN
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT LLPCIRA CENTRE2929 ARCH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 2808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | sales promotion for others provided through the distribution and the administration of privileged user cards; promoting the sale of goods and services of others by awarding purchase points for credit card use; promotion services provided by a commercial company by means of a customer loyalty card | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | credit card services; debit card services; charge card services, namely, prepaid charge card services, electronic credit and debit services, smart card and electronic cash services, and electronic cash transactions; providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; credit card verification; dissemination of financial information via global information networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIA DE DISEÑO TEXTIL, S.A. (INDITEX, S.A.)
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named AFFINITY CARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |