USPTO serial 79039811
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, flavorings for cakes or beverages, namely essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, shampoos, dentifrices, depilatories, make-up, lipstick, beauty masks, shaving products, namely, shaving creams, shaving foam, shaving gels, shaving lotions, shaving soaps, sunscreens, namely, cosmetic preparations for skin tanning, cotton buds for cosmetic use, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, eaux de toilette, perfumes, cosmetic creams; deodorants for personal use, incense, oils for cosmetic use, cleansing milks for toilet use, potpourris | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |