USPTO serial 79039979
LAGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3531162Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LAGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B-9031 DRONGEN, BE
B-9031 DRONGEN, BE
B-9031 DRONGEN, BE
BE
Luxembourg, LU
BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Handelsman
Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemical products for industrial purposes, namely, polymer, polymer dispersions and hydrocarbon resins; chemical compounds, namely, silicon fluids and silicon resins ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | Industrial oils; industrial greases; all purpose lubricants; paraffin; crude oil; petroleum jelly for industrial purposes; wax; wax emulsions and wax powders for industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | [ Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely, petroleum jelly disinfectants and petroleum jelly antibiotics ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GOVI N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GOVI N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GOVI N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GOVI PRODUCTION COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Christeyns Luxembourg S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ALGIMO
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named LAGO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |