USPTO serial 79040020
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Suitcases; trunks for travelling; travelling bags; Boston bags; handbags; attaché cases; backpacks; rucksacks; bags for campers; bags for climbers; beach bags; briefcases; wallets for business cards; card cases notecases; carry-on bags; chain mesh purses, not of precious metal; charm bags (Omamori-ire); wallets for commutation tickets; folding briefcases; garment bags for travel; Gladstone bags; haversacks; Japanese utility pouches (shingen-bukuro); key cases; kori wicker trunks; leather shoulder belts; music cases; net bags for shopping; pocket wallets; purses; purses, not of precious metal; school bags; school satchels; schoolchildren's backpacks; shopping bags; shoulder bags; leather shoulder straps; suitcase handles; travelling sets (leatherware); valises; wallets, not of precious metal; wheeled shopping bags; suitcase belts; drawstring bags; pouches; vanity cases, sold empty | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |