USPTO serial 79040037
TULIP BY-LIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TULIP BY-LIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
Hengelo, NL
Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
BG Hengelo OV, NL
Other trademarks owned by Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Montgomery
JOHN W. MONTGOMERY OSHA LIANG LLP909 Fannin Street, Suite 3500HOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, [canvas shopping bag, textile shopping bag,] leather shopping bags, [canvas garment bags for travel, leather garment bags for travel, textile garment bags for travel, canvas net bags for shopping, leather net bags for shopping, textile net bags for shopping, canvas beach bags,] [leather beach bags,] [textile beach bags,] rucksacks [, schoolbags, tool bags sold empty; shopping bags, namely, canvas shopping bags, leather shopping bags and textile shopping bags; trunks and traveling bags; leather and imitations of leather and goods made of these materials, namely, wallets] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by By-Lin Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Exploitatiemaatschappij; Van der Poel Hengelo B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named TULIP BY-LIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |