USPTO serial 79040060
NEBBIOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEBBIOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |