USPTO serial 79040096
UNITED IN MUSIC ORCHESTRA FOR THE UNITED NATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNITED IN MUSIC ORCHESTRA FOR THE UNITED NATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Chalfie
Edward J. Chalfie Welsh & Katz, Ltd.120 S. Riverside PlazaSuite 2200Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotion of a worldwide charity concert, including by means of distribution of printed material for fundraising projects; merchandising for a worldwide charity concert | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Fundraising for a worldwide charity concert as well as intermediary services therefor; money collecting projects for a worldwide charity concert; financial sponsoring of a worldwide charity concert and intermediary services therefor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Organizing educational events, congresses and symposia mainly in the field of music and the United Nations system; performing of music and amusement programs also by means of radio and television; organization of musical, relaxing and recreational events mainly in the field of charity concerts; services of performing artists in cooperation, among which organization of musical performances; publishing and dissemination of books, newspapers, magazines, brochures, posters and photos, mainly in the field of music and the United Nations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | IRRE | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL REQUIRES EXAMINER REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |