USPTO serial 79040103
TAKARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3892580Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2010
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAKARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Patch
Andrew J. Patch YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON STSTE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1764Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras for photography; cinematographic cameras; apparatus for recording, transmitting, reproducing sound or images; headphones; tuner amplifiers; digital tuner amplifiers; apparatus for processing sounds or images, namely, central processing units; magnetic data media, namely magnetic tape recorders and magnetic cards; phonograph records for the automobile domain featuring music; blank optical discs, compact discs for the automobile domain featuring music; blank floppy discs for computers; calculating machines; data processing equipment, namely, data processors; computers; amplifiers; audio amplifiers; sound equalizers; audio equipment for vehicles, namely, equalizers; aerials; phonographs; transformers; transceivers; compact-disc players; video-disc players; cassette players; car radio laser readers, namely, optical readers for use in automobile sound systems; video screens and video monitors; computers, namely, on-board computers featuring data storage cards for navigation for vehicles; alarms, namely, central alarm units, fire alarms; camcorders; radio-telephones; radios; audio receivers; television sets; MP3 players; computers, computers, namely, on-board computers featuring navigation apparatus for vehicles; fire extinguishers; video game software; software to control and improve audio equipment sound quality; computer peripheral devices, namely, computer cameras, computer central processing units, computer fax modem cards, computer hard discs, computer keyboards, computer memories, computer mice, computer serial ports; detectors, namely, laser object detectors for use on vehicles, ultrasonic object detectors for use on vehicles, and radar object detectors for use on vehicles; electric relays, memory cards, microprocessors cards; cellular phones; personal audio cassette players; automobile radios; digital MP3 players, DVD players; ceiling projection screens; FM modulators; combination DVD players and monitors in the nature of computer hardware; cabinets for loudspeakers; flashing safety lights; jump start cables for motors; computer memories; computer printers; speed control apparatus for vehicles in the nature of cruise control; speedometers for vehicles; electric installations for the prevention of theft, namely theft alarms; voltage regulators for vehicles; mileage recorders for vehicles, namely, odometers; vehicles breakdown warning triangles; projection screens; video screens; batteries; electric transformers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles; horns for vehicles that sound when the vehicle is exceeding the speed limit; doors panels for land vehicles; trailer hitches for vehicles; anti-theft devices for vehicles; tyres for vehicle wheels; sun visors for automobiles; luggage carriers for vehicles; head-rests for vehicle seats; seat covers for vehicles; safety belts for vehicle seats; pneumatic tyres; rear view mirrors; seats for vehicles; rims for vehicle wheels; suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; vehicle bumpers; bodies for automobiles; hoods for automobile; vehicle chassis; fixed or removable brackets for positioning a monitor behind a seat or a head-rest for vehicle seats; ski carriers for vehicles; anti-skid chains; chains for automobiles; inner tubes for pneumatic tyres; hub caps; luggage nets for vehicles; security harnesses for vehicle seats | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LELLOUCHE Charles Franklin
- Other trademarks owned by LELLOUCHE Charles Franklin
- Other trademarks owned by LELLOUCHE Charles Franklin
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named TAKARA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |