USPTO serial 79040108
KITOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3540465Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2008
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KITOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Okin Goldsmith
Susan Okin Goldsmith McCarter & English, LLPTwo Tower Center Boulevard, 24th FloorEast Brunswick, NJ 08816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [Metal building materials, namely, [ball joints,] tubes, frameworks,] [metal privacy panels in the nature of a metal panel mounted to the top of table supports which acts as a privacy screen to separate work spaces,] [doors, doorstops, door panels,] [cotter pins, supports, swing arms;] [ metal keys for locks; metal clothes hooks; metal handles, namely, for doors and drawers;] metal bins; binding screws of metal for cables; metal fittings for furniture, namely, [brackets,] screws, [dowels,] [link chains,] power strips in the nature of a metal furniture fitting affixed to metal furniture; cable wire baskets in the nature of baskets made of metal wire used to hold cables; [cable ventilating ducts,] universal supports, CPU holders in the nature of a metal furniture accessory mounted to table supports to ensure a secure fit for CPUs, [metal casters for furniture;] [metal junctions for pipes; metal hinges] [; metal index card boxes] | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | [Manuals for computer software about furniture, interior decoration and furniture fittings and accessories; suspended file record carriers] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |