USPTO serial 79040208
LES SECRETS DE LADUR?E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LES SECRETS DE LADUR?E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, flavorings for cakes or beverages, namely, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, shampoos, dentifrices, depilatories, make-up, lipstick, beauty masks, shaving products, namely, shaving creams, shaving foam, shaving gels, shaving lotions, shaving soaps, sunscreens, namely, cosmetic preparations for skin tanning, cotton buds for cosmetic use, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, eaux de toilette, perfumes, cosmetic creams; incense, oils for cosmetic use, cleansing milks for toilet use, potpourris | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LADUREE INTERNATIONAL SA
- Other trademarks owned by LADUREE INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by LADUREE INTERNATIONAL SA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LES SECRETS DE LADUR?E
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |