Drawing for IRISA

USPTO serial 79040412

IRISA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRISA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic preparations and products containing iris cellsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 28, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 22, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance