Drawing for CENTERLITE

USPTO serial 79040419

CENTERLITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3458356Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTERLITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PRESTON SMIRMAN

PRESTON SMIRMAN SMIRMAN IP LAW, PLLC116 TERRY AVENUEROCHESTER, MI 48307UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic window shutters; non-metal external roller blinds; ready mountable building parts, namely, non-metal external shutters, non-metal building flashing, non-metal window sills; non-metal windows; non-metal skylights; non-metal window frames; glass, namely, insulated glass, and common sheet glass; [ insulating glass and ] window glass; non-metal roof materials and roof elements, namely, roofing, roofing fabrics, roofing slates, roofing panels, roofing underlayment, roof trussesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 4, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 6, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 25, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2008LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance