Drawing for FUGRO SMARTPIPE

USPTO serial 79040456

FUGRO SMARTPIPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUGRO SMARTPIPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP38500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Geotechnical apparatus and instruments for test installations, namely, a frame equipped with t-bars, pipe, cameras, sonar, roll and pitch sensors, sensors, fiber optic cable, displacement transducers, for testing on the spot of sea pipelines and of measure equipment; geotechnical apparatus for the inspection of pipelines on the bottom of the sea, namely a frame equipped with t-bars, pipe, cameras, sonar, roll and pitch sensors, sensors, fiber optic cable, displacement transducers; computer software and computer hardware for geotechnical modeling purposes for use in testing sea pipelines, measuring soil/pipe interaction and water pressureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Geotechnical engineering services; geotechnical services, namely providing advice and information reports in the field of on-the-spot testing of sea pipelinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 2, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance