Drawing for POWERSENSE

USPTO serial 79040508

POWERSENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERSENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie Nichols Matthews

SHANNON TRAVIS WILDMAN HARROLD ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 WEST WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606-1229UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments, namely, optical sensors, conductors, fibre cables, optical cables, central processing units, modules and portable calibration units, for measuring, signaling, checking, supervising and fault-finding, of power supply systems; apparatus and instruments, namely, optical sensors, conductors, fibre cables, optical cables, central processing units, modules and portable calibration units, for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricityABANDONED—
042Technological consultancy related to energy utilization rate; technical consultancy in the field of supervision and control systems for the utility industryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 3, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 8, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 8, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 8, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 23, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 10, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 15, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance