Drawing for PORT CHARLOTTE

USPTO serial 79040563

PORT CHARLOTTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488882Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PORT CHARLOTTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, whiskyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 21, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 24, 2014EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2014PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Feb 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 5, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 5, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2013CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 19, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 28, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2012CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
May 2, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2012INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2012LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance