Drawing for CHEMMER

USPTO serial 79040574

CHEMMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEMMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Gummed tape (stationery); sealing compounds for stationery purposes; gluten (glues) for stationery or household purposes; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; adhesives tapes for stationery or household purposes; adhesives bands for stationery or household purposes; starch paste for stationery or household purposes; pastes for stationery or household purposes; gums (adhesives) for stationery or household purposes; non-setting adhesive paperSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 12, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 16, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 9, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance