USPTO serial 79040612
THINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3831969Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AT
Kopfing, AT
Kopfing, AT
Kopfing, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen A. Rubel
Ellen A. Rubel Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 North Tryon StreetSuite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Think Schuhwerk GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Think Schuhwerk GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Marko Schuhfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Marko Schuhfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |