USPTO serial 79040621
VENTURINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENTURINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce W. Jenzano
Ellen A. Rubel Moore & Van Allen PLLC430 Davis DriveSuite 500Morrisville, NC 27560Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Aprons; ascots; babies' diapers of textile; babies' pants; bandanas; neckerchiefs; bath robes; bath sandals; bath slippers; bathing caps; bathing suits; bathing trunks; beachwear; beach shoes; belts; money belts; berets; bibs not of paper; boas; bodices; lingerie; boot uppers; boots; boots for sports; brassieres; breeches; camisoles; caps; headwear, namely hat; chasubles; clothing for gymnastics, namely tights and leotards; clothing of imitations of leather, namely, jackets, pants and shirts; clothing of leather, namely jackets, pants, shirts; collar protectors; collars; combinations; corselets; corsets; cyclists' clothing, namely, cyclists' jerseys; detachable collars; dress shields; dressing gowns; ear muffs; esparto shoes or sandals; fittings of metal for shoes and boots; football shoes; foot muffs, not electrically heated; footwear; footwear uppers; frocks; fur stoles; furs clothing, namely, fur cloaks, fur coats, fur hat, fur jacket, fur muffs; gabardines; galoshes; garters; girdles; gloves; gymnastic shoes; half boots; hat frames; hats; headbands; headgear, namely caps and hats; heelpieces for boots and shoes; heelpieces for stockings; heels; hoods; hosiery; inner soles; jackets; jerseys; jumpers; knitwear, namely, knit shirts and knit pants; lace boots; layettes; leggings; liveries; maniples; mantillas; masquerade costumes; mitres, namely, turbans; mittens; motorists' clothing, namely, vests, motorcycle gloves, muffs; neckties; non slipping devices for boots and shoes, namely rubber soles; outerclothing, namely, jackets, anoraks, raincoat; overalls; overcoats; pants; paper clothing, namely, paper hats; parkas; pelerines; petticoats; pocket squares; pockets for clothing; pullovers; pyjamas, ready-made clothing, namely, ready made shirts, ready made shorts, ready made pants; finished textile lining for garments; sandals; saris; sashes for wear; scarves; shawls; shirt fronts; shirt yokes; shirts; shoes; shower caps; singlets; ski boots; skirts; skull caps; slippers; slips; sock suspenders, socks; soles for footwear; spats; sports shoes; stocking suspenders; stockings; perspiration absorbent stockings; studs for football boots; stuff jackets; suits; suspenders; sweat-absorbent underwear clothing; sweaters; teddies; undergarments; T-shirts; tights; tips for footwear; togas; top hats; trouser straps; trousers; turbans; underpants; underwear; uniforms; veils; fishing vests; hunting vests; long sleeved vests; waistcoats; waterproof clothing, namely water proof jacket and pants; welts for boots and shoes; wet suits for water-skiing; wimples; wooden shoes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |