USPTO serial 79040650
COUCKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUCKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textiles; bed and table covers; fabrics for textile use; elastic fabrics; velvet; bed linen; household linen; table linen not of paper; bath linen (except clothing) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COUCKE
- Other trademarks owned by VANDERSCHOOTEN BERNARD
- Other trademarks owned by La société VANDERSCHOOTEN - SAS au capital de 1.000 EUROS
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named COUCKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |