Drawing for X

USPTO serial 79040744

X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3382257Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2008
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Johnson Walden

Cynthia Johnson Walden FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.P.O. BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55400-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Chips in the nature of integrated circuits; integrated circuits; semiconductors; silicon wafersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 6, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 14, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 14, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 30, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Jan 25, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 26, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Dec 9, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance