Drawing for LEAR

USPTO serial 79040776

LEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Building materials of metal; buildings of metal; fences of metal; latches of metal; shutters of metal; door panels of metal: roofing of metal; door cases of metal; aluminum-plastic board (aluminum based); windows of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
019Building materials, not of metal; rigid pipes not of metal (building)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 22, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance