USPTO serial 79040779
MAD FOR GARLIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3409483Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2008
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAD FOR GARLIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sumner C. Rosenberg
Sumner C. Rosenberg NEEDLE & ROSENBERG, P.C.999 Peachtree StreetSuite 1000Atlanta, GA 30309-3915Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Canteen services, tourist restaurants, cafes, restaurants, self-service restaurants, restaurant chain services, Chinese restaurants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |