Drawing for CATAPULT

USPTO serial 79040783

CATAPULT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATAPULT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs; computer programs to organise, facilitate, manage and monitor the dispatch of vehicles, including passenger transport vehicles; computer programs to organise, facilitate, manage and monitor various dispatches from call centres and radio networks including the dispatch of vehicles including passenger transport vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance