Drawing for GYRO

USPTO serial 79040836

GYRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488883Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GYRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental instruments, namely, [ electric micromotors, air-driven micromotors and their parts, ball bearing turbines, air bearing turbines and straight turbines with pneumatic unit, electrical controls for electric micromotors for dental use, handpieces and ] contra-angle handpieces for air-driven micromotors for dental useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 13, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 22, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 19, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 12, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 7, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
May 7, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 7, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 7, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2009LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance