Drawing for DIWAHYBRID

USPTO serial 79040857

DIWAHYBRID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3583490Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 3, 2009
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIWAHYBRID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roxana A. Sullivan

ROXANA A. SULLIVAN DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATES, LLC.120 SOUTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1400CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Hybrid motors for watercraft and aircraft; drive units for watercraft and aircraft; gears for watercraft and aircraft; hydrodynamic drive trains for watercraft and aircraft ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Motors and engines for land vehicles; hybrid motors and engines for land vehicles; drive units for land vehicles; gearboxes for land vehicles; hydrodynamic drive trains for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 4, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 6, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 6, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 6, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 5, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance