Drawing for RITTER SOLAR

USPTO serial 79040866

RITTER SOLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3531168Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2008
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RITTER SOLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Lombard, Esquire

Ronald S. Lombard, Esquire LAW OFFICE OF RONALD S. LOMBARD4430 Twin Oaks DriveMurrysville, PA 15668UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Thermal engines, namely, block-type thermal engines for machines ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
011[ Air-condition units and ventilation hoods; ] heating systems comprised of solar collectors, solar controller, solar storage tank for hot water, expansion tank using solar technology and heat pumps [ ; heat recovery apparatus comprised of ventilation apparatus, namely, an exhaust heat exchanger; apparatus for household supply and disposal of energy, namely, hybrid storage units, fuel cells; apparatus for the composting and recycling of grey water, namely, water purification units ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 15, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 4, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 4, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 21, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 28, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 10, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 22, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2012DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 30, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance