USPTO serial 79040915
S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3436420Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph F. Schmidt
Joseph F. Schmidt Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP111 E. Wacker DrSte. 2800CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, candy, chocolate, chocolates and chocolate candy [ and pastries ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |