USPTO serial 79041029
CLINIQUE VERT-PRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLINIQUE VERT-PRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dermatological and sanitary products, preparations and creams, for medical use; skin care products, particularly, skin care creams for pharmaceutical use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |