Drawing for BHS

USPTO serial 79041089

BHS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598592Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BHS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan H. Calvert

Nathan H. Calvert Calvert Technology Law, PLLC4906 Turnback StLago Vista, TX 78745United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and installations for mixing solids, and solids and liquids; machines and installations for processing, in particular crushing, primary raw materials, in particular minerals, ores, salts and coal; crushing machines and processing installations for recycling metals containing waste materials; machines and installations for solid-fluid separationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Dec 11, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 11, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 25, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 24, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 13, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 14, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance