Drawing for FITTFUSION

USPTO serial 79041092

FITTFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580612Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FITTFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017RUBBER, GUTTA-PERCHA, GUM, ASBESTOS, MICA AND GOODS MADE FROM THESE MATERIALS, NAMELY, AGRICULTURAL HOSES, GARDEN HOSES, SPRINKLER HOSES; NON-METAL PIPE FITTINGS FOR USE WITH GARDEN HOSES; NON-METAL CONNECTING HOSES FOR IRRIGATION AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; FLEXIBLE PIPES, NOT OF METAL, IN PARTICULAR FLEXIBLE PIPES IN PLASTIC MATERIALSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 21, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 25, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 25, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2012CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 27, 2012CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 8, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance