USPTO serial 79041093
PLATINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3480870Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2008
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PLATINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, p.c.901 New York Avenue, NWSuite 900 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electronically controlled cutting and welding laser machines, for the automotive, aerospace and sheet metal industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |