Drawing for NAVELIA

USPTO serial 79041129

NAVELIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3462616Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2008
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAVELIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT D. WOLDOW

Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water filters for household purposes and for commercial purposes; water treatment appliances, namely, water bars, water cooler, water sparkler and water filter, water purifiers, water purifying apparatus, water purifying units, water conditioning units, tap water purifying apparatus, reverse osmosis appliances and cartridge filtration units; filter cartridges containing ion exchangers and/or adsorbents for water filtersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance