Drawing for CONTISOFT

USPTO serial 79041148

CONTISOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3436426Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CONTISOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wm. Tucker Griffith

Wm. Tucker Griffith MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STREET, CITYPLACE IIHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Dosage dispensers, namely, machines for dispensing pre-determined dosages of chemicals for water treatment, for lime prevention, for inhibiting corrosion, and for disinfectionACTIVE—
011Water purifying apparatus, in particular for environmentally friendly and/or chemical-free water treatment; water softening units; water purifying apparatus for lime protection, mainly consisting of physical apparatus and instruments for water treatment; water treatment plants; apparatus for water treatment, namely, chemical sterilization units, lime protection units, corrosion protection units; water filters; de-salination unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 6, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 27, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 2, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 2, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 28, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance