USPTO serial 79041165
VENYON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4340363Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2013
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENYON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LANE4TH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical devices, namely, data processors for communications with electronic chip cards having an integrated circuit and electronic chip cards having a contactless interface; data processing devices, namely, data processors for writing data into and onto blank and encoded electronic chip cards, for reading data out of and from encoded electronic chip cards, and for displaying data from an encoded electronic chip card on a display; data processing devices, namely, data processors for personalizing blank and encoded electronic chip cards; machine readable recording mediums for use in mobile applications, namely, encoded electronic chip cards having an integrated circuit and containing programming used for storing, processing and providing data and programs; cards having an integrated circuit for use in mobile applications, namely, encoded electronic chip cards having microprocessors and containing programming for communication with external data processors and with mobile radio terminals; coded telecommunication cards for use in mobile applications, namely, encoded electronic chip cards for use in mobile communication devices; coded cards having a contactless interface, namely, encoded electronic chip cards having an antenna for use in contactless communications systems; integrated circuits having characteristic physical properties for protection against forgery in connection with encoded electronic chip cards; electrical devices for encrypting data for cash-less payment transactions using magnetic stripe cards and encoded electronic chip cards, both in online operation and in offline operation; computer software for applications in computer networks, namely, computer software for processing transactions and data for mobile applications adaptable with internet, intranet and extranet applications; computer software for telecommunication in mobile applications with encoded electronic chip card-activated mobile phones and associated electronic chip cards and mobile phones; computer software programs for activating, changing, testing and displaying data and software structures stored in telecommunication cards; computer software for encrypting and signing data; computer operating system software for mobile applications for blank and encoded electronic chip cards having an integrated circuit; computer software for data processors for mobile applications in communication with encoded electronic chip cards; computer programs for developing, managing and maintaining all the above-mentioned kinds of software for mobile applications; recording mediums, namely, data recorders, used in connection with the above-mentioned software for mobile applications | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | leasing of software, namely, closed-end leasing of software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | providing of access to data stored electronically in computer networks for remote consultation; electronic transmission of data via computer networks; telecommunications services, namely, personalization and configuring of mobile phones and other telecommunication terminals by way of contactless communication, namely, PDAs, smart phones, notebook computers, pagers, and handheld computers for others by over-the-air-methods, namely, GSM, UMTS, CDMA, GPRS, RFID, open wireless protocols for exchanging data over short distances | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | developing, programming, installing and maintaining of software; consultation in the field of computer software, namely, the technology of mobile applications, and the application of the above-mentioned kinds of software for transmission of software via contact-less interfaces; rental of software; technical consultation on the securing of data against imitation, falsification and unauthorized eavesdropping in electronic communication systems and preparation of concepts for such technical consultation, namely, provision of computer security information; services of a certifying authority, namely, encryption, decryption and authentication of data, in the nature of an internet trust center, namely, issuance and authentication of digital keys, encryption algorithms and digital signatures; analog recording of data, namely, recording data for others on a magnetic medium for electronic storage; digital recording of data, namely, recording of data for others on digital media, namely, compact discs, floppy discs, memory sticks, RAM and hard drives, for electronic storage; data management in computer networks, namely, processing and recording of data in connection with the above-mentioned kinds of software and in connection with a transmission of software via contact-less interfaces of mobile devices, namely, PDAs, smart phones, notebook computers, pagers, handheld computers and chip cards, namely, device management, mobile device management, and card and application management | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Venyon Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Venyon Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Venyon Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VENYON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |